Tesla, Square, and the Corporate Bitcoin Treasury Movement
MicroStrategy started it, but Tesla, Block (Square), and dozens of companies followed. The corporate Bitcoin treasury movement is reshaping how businesses manage reserves.
Uvin Vindula — IAMUVIN
Published 2025-12-25 · Updated 2026-01-12
MicroStrategy Opened the Door — Others Walked Through
When MicroStrategy made its Bitcoin treasury announcement in August 2020, the financial world treated it as an oddity — the eccentric bet of a maverick CEO. But then something remarkable happened: other companies started following suit. And the trickle became a stream.
The Early Adopters
Tesla (February 2021)
When Elon Musk's Tesla disclosed a $1.5 billion Bitcoin purchase in its 10-K filing, it sent shockwaves through the corporate world. Tesla was a top-10 most valuable company in the world. If Tesla was holding Bitcoin, the "Bitcoin isn't for serious companies" argument evaporated instantly.
Tesla's relationship with Bitcoin has been complicated — briefly accepting BTC for car purchases, then pausing over environmental concerns, selling portions of its holdings. But as of 2025, Tesla still holds approximately 10,000+ BTC on its balance sheet, valued at over $1 billion.
Block (Square) / Jack Dorsey
Block Inc. (formerly Square), led by Bitcoin maximalist Jack Dorsey, invested $220 million in Bitcoin across two purchases in 2020-2021. But Dorsey went further than just holding Bitcoin:
- Cash App: Made buying Bitcoin easy for millions of users
- Spiral: Block's Bitcoin development division, funding open-source Bitcoin projects
- TBD: Building decentralized identity and exchange protocols on Bitcoin
- Mining: Block designed and built its own Bitcoin mining ASIC chip
Dorsey's approach represents the deepest corporate integration of Bitcoin — not just holding it as an asset, but building the company's future around it.
The Growing List
By 2025, the list of public companies holding Bitcoin on their balance sheets has grown significantly:
| Company | BTC Holdings (approx.) | Industry |
|---|---|---|
| MicroStrategy | 400,000+ | Software/Bitcoin |
| Marathon Digital | 40,000+ | Bitcoin Mining |
| Tesla | 10,000+ | Automotive/Energy |
| Riot Platforms | 15,000+ | Bitcoin Mining |
| Block Inc. | 8,000+ | Fintech |
| Coinbase | 10,000+ | Crypto Exchange |
| Hut 8 Mining | 9,000+ | Bitcoin Mining |
Beyond major holders, dozens of smaller companies — from Japanese investment firms to Canadian tech companies — have allocated portions of their treasury to Bitcoin.
The Accounting Breakthrough
A major catalyst for corporate adoption was the FASB accounting standards change in December 2023. Previously, companies had to use the "indefinite-lived intangible asset" model for Bitcoin, meaning they could write down losses but couldn't mark up gains until they sold. This made Bitcoin holdings look terrible on financial statements during downturns.
The new fair value accounting standard (ASU 2023-08) allows companies to report Bitcoin at its current market value, recognizing both gains and losses. This eliminates the accounting penalty that had been discouraging corporate adoption.
Why Companies Are Doing This
Corporate Bitcoin adoption is driven by several factors:
- Treasury management: Cash yields have been poor relative to inflation for most of the last 15 years. Bitcoin offers potential appreciation that cash can't match.
- Brand positioning: Holding Bitcoin signals innovation, forward-thinking, and alignment with tech-savvy consumers.
- Stock premium: Companies with Bitcoin holdings often trade at premiums to their fundamental value (the "Bitcoin premium" on MSTR is the clearest example).
- Hedge against debasement: Like Saylor's original thesis, companies see Bitcoin as protection against purchasing power erosion.
- Competitive pressure: As more companies adopt Bitcoin, those that don't may face questions from shareholders about why they're not diversifying.
The Skeptics' Case
Not everyone is convinced. Critics argue:
- Companies should return excess cash to shareholders, not speculate on Bitcoin
- Bitcoin's volatility creates unwanted P&L fluctuations
- Custody and security risks add operational complexity
- Fiduciary duty concerns — is it appropriate to put shareholder money in a volatile asset?
These are legitimate concerns, and I think the right answer is position sizing. A 1-5% Bitcoin allocation is very different from MicroStrategy's all-in approach. Most companies adopting Bitcoin treasury strategies are keeping allocations modest and measured.
What Comes Next
I believe we're in the early innings of corporate Bitcoin adoption. As the accounting standards change takes effect, as ETF legitimization continues, and as more case studies emerge, the barriers to corporate adoption will continue falling.
The question for companies is no longer "should we hold Bitcoin?" — it's "can we afford not to?" When your competitors, your customers, and your shareholders are all thinking about Bitcoin, ignoring it becomes the risky choice.
For individual investors in Sri Lanka, corporate adoption is bullish because it creates persistent, long-term demand. Companies don't day-trade their treasury holdings. Follow the latest developments on our blog and build your knowledge at our learning center.

By Uvin Vindula — IAMUVIN
Sri Lanka's leading Bitcoin educator. Author of "The Rise of Bitcoin".
Learn more →Related Articles
The Bitcoin Brief: LK
Weekly Bitcoin insights, market analysis, and Sri Lanka crypto news. Join 1,000+ readers.
Unsubscribe anytime · Educational content only